Tuesday, 1 December 2015
Trading results from my Essex FTA Course
Final results from the demo trading on my Essex FTA course. Profit for the quarter 6.56% on drawdown of 5.3%. If I had gone to 53% drawdown, profit would be 65.6%. All through doing proper stops and targets! Results from Darwinex.
Friday, 27 November 2015
Gold - finding a bottom
Another post from my Essex FTA course which is coming to an end now. If you are thinking of taking this course, these blog posts should give you an idea of the work involved.
Sadly, my gold trade did not hit the target of $1105 mentioned in my post of November 16th, but after reaching $1088, promptly reverse and hit my stop. I should have re-set my stop to break-even to avoid a loss, but I didn't.
I have stayed out for the last week, expecting a reversal, but instead saw the metal break long-term support of $1080, reverse at $1064, and now find $1080 as resistance.
A re-examination of the chart shows a clear descending triangle, which is 5th out of 23 in success in Bulkowksi, 2005:711-729[1] as shown below.
Now is maybe not the best time to enter, as the pattern allows for a possible $5 bounce before resuming it's downward trend. But on the other hand, the trend is very strong. I have therefore placed a trade at market
Size : 5 units
Entry : $1068
Stop Loss : $1076 (above the descending line)
Target : $1032
The target is difficult, as the instrument is at 7-year lows and so we are into uncharted (no pun intended) territory. I have taken the March 2008 top of $1032 as support, the last time it did something major, shall we say a $500 round trip.
Gold 2006-2010. Source tradingview.com
I have added a line for the current price, and the case for this level of support is instantly made, visually.
The price/action in February 2010, and the round point show a possible pause in decline at $1050, and this would be a good point to take, say, half the position off and move the stop loss to break even.
David Atherton
References
[1] Bulkowksi, T., Encyclopaedia of Chart Patterns, 2005, Wiley
Wednesday, 25 November 2015
More Gandalf's pub than the famous marque
On 25 October I wrote about Ferrari's $60 IPO. You can check the post here.
http://adatherton.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/im-not-raceing-to-buy-ferrari.html
In fact you must read it to get the most of this posting. Anyway, as you know I was pretty negative. So what happened to the shares?
http://adatherton.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/im-not-raceing-to-buy-ferrari.html
In fact you must read it to get the most of this posting. Anyway, as you know I was pretty negative. So what happened to the shares?
Well after starting in pole position, they entered the race badly, and have fallen behind. The price took a brief pitstop on 31 October, and then entered the race to the bottom again. They have managed to lose 25% in a month, closing tonight at $45.64. This is in a month when automotive share have soared, following a little problem in Germany, home of Ferrari's chief competitor on the track, Mercedes, owned by Daimler AG (DAI.GY). How have they done in the same period?
Up by nearly 10%. You can see the difference even more markedly in this chart for the last week.
Now at the IPO, Ferrari's price was 72 and Mercedes was 60. So Ferrari were in the lead. Pole position on that ludicrous PE. Now Mercedes are at 80 and Ferrari is at 45. How much less than 45 is 80. 56% less. Why is that figure significant? Let's look at the F1 Constructor tables for the 2015 season so far from the formula1.com website.
What's 401 divided by 660. 60.7%. Pretty close if you ask me. In fact, a racing certainty that RACE share price is going to fall another 4%. At least!
Did you get the reference in the title of the article? If not click here
Tuesday, 24 November 2015
UK Supermarkets - FA vs TA
Another posting from my Essex FTA course. This one is completely counter-intuitive for a fundamental analyst, and is designed to prove the superiority of technicals in the short-term (1-2 weeks). We shall see!
It is clear
that TSCO having already fell sharply the week before, actually rose slightly
on November 17, and fell again. At the time of writing the price
is 164.50p, a support level which held in October, and indeed in December 2014,
subject to a one-day outlying spike (to 155.40 the old 2003 low).
I was alerted to this study initially,
because I noticed that TSCO and MRW were right their support levels once again,
and before leaping in with a buy, decided to do some fundamental research as
well.
On 17 November, respected retail research
company Kantar WorldPanel produced their regular report on supermarket market
shares. It comes as no surprise to find that upstart competitors Aldi and Lidl
had taken their market share of the UK sector sale to over 10%.
Fraser
McKevitt, head of retail and consumer insight at Kantar Worldpanel, comments:
“If you look back as recently as 2012 Aldi and Lidl only held a 5% share of the
market, and it had previously taken them nine years to double their combined
share from 2.5%. In the last 12 weeks the two retailers have attracted another
additional million shoppers compared with last year[1]
In other words, the trend that has been
observed a few years now is not only continuing but accelerating. Sadly for
investors Aldi and Lidl are private companies.
The public companies in the sector are
Tesco (LON:TSCO), J Sainsbury (LON:SBRY), and Wm Morrison (LON:MRW). The Asda
chain is part of the US Wal-Mart behemoth (NYSE:WMT), but the UK Asda
operations are not significant enough to affect the overall share price.
Looking further into the Kantar report, we
find that “Sainsbury’s
has seen its fourth consecutive period of growth, flying in the face of tough
market conditions. It’s 1.5% increase in sales was sufficiently ahead of the
market for the retailer to increase its share by 0.2 percentage points – the
first share gain registered by any of the ‘big four’ retailers since October
2014.”[2], but that “..sales fell at the rest of the major retailers
– at Tesco they were down by 2.5% while Morrisons saw sales fall by 1.7%.”[3]
So
Sainsbury’s have not lost market share, whereas the other two FTSE-quoted
players have. Let us see how this has affected their share prices.
Immediately, I
am attracted to the strength of that technical support, notwithstanding
fundamental bad news.
MRW shows an
almost identical pattern. A low reached in December 2014, was again touched in
October, and we are at this support level, the round point price of 150p, for a
third time today. Once again November 17 showed a small rise.
So what of
SBRY, the ‘winner’ in this report. As you might expect, their share price is
slightly stronger. The price rose a little more than TSCO and MRW following
this report, but it is notable this share too exhibits the pattern shown by the
other supermarkets. The SBRY support line is at 223p, and was touched, like
TSCO and MRW in December 2014 and October 2015, with an additional touch in
October 2014.
However, the
price today of 248p is 25p (10%) above the support line. Also unlike the other supermarkets, the share price chart contains a large gap on September 30,
following a 10% leap on an earnings report[4]. This gap has been partially but
not wholly filled.
My contention
is that the good news for Sainsbury’s from this report is ephemeral, and the
share is in fact a week behind TSCO and MRW, and is therefore doomed to fall to
the 223p support level again before advancing. On TSCO and MRW, I think the
support is so strong that it will hold, and those shares will now rise. My
timeframe is a week or two, and certainly no later than the end of the year, as
trading statements are delivered from MRW, SBRY and TSCO on January 12,
13 and 14 respectively[5], and technical
movement needs to be unimpeded by fundamental data.
It is not
possible to check P/E ratios as of today, because TSCO and MRW’s last earnings
report showed losses. The less used ratio of book value to market cap, and
dividend yield shows
Symbol
|
Book Value(£M)
|
Market Cap (£M)
|
Ratio
|
Div%
|
TSCO
|
£7,100
|
£13,440
|
189%
|
0.60%
|
SBRY
|
£5,500
|
£4,800
|
87%
|
4.89%
|
MRW
|
£3,600
|
£3,560
|
101%
|
7.30%
|
which would
confirm MRW as a buy, for yield alone, but mark TSCO as a sell, and SBRY, as
the only one making a profit and
valued below book as a strong buy.
Nevertheless
this trade is a test of the superiority of short-term technicals over
fundamentals, and so I have today placed the
following trade
I will review the position in about a week.
David Atherton
827 words, 129 words directly quoted, 15.6%
(within guidelines)
References
[1] Fraser McKevitt, Kantar Worldpanel
website, retrieved 24 Nov 2015 - http://www.kantarworldpanel.com/global/News/Aldi-and-Lidl-reach-10-per-cent-share-of-the-British-grocer
[3] Fraser McKevitt, ibid.
[4] The Motley Fool website, retrieved 24
Nov 2015 - http://www.fool.co.uk/investing/2015/09/30/j-sainsbury-plc-shares-rocket-over-10-after-raising-profit-forecast/
[5] Event calendar from Google Finance
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)